No need to slam the door or put the hammer down.
- Dana Dillard

- Jun 10
- 2 min read

Difficult conversations are part of leadership. How you approach them matters more than many leaders realize.
Some leaders avoid corrective feedback altogether and hope the issue fixes itself. Others come into the conversation frustrated, defensive, or intimidating. But the most effective leaders take a different approach: they lead with curiosity.
Instead of immediately jumping into criticism, they create space for understanding first. For example:
“I wanted to talk with you because your performance seems different lately. Before I get into specifics, I’d like to hear from you first. What’s been going on from your perspective?”
Or:
“I have a few concerns I’d like to discuss regarding your engagement at work. But before we dive in, I want to hear from you. How are things going for you right now?”
That simple shift changes the entire tone of the conversation.
When leaders start with curiosity:
* People become less defensive
* Important context surfaces
* Trust is preserved
* The conversation becomes more productive
Sometimes, poor performance is exactly what it appears to be. But sometimes, there’s a challenge happening behind the scenes that you weren’t aware of — burnout, confusion, stress, conflict, or even personal struggles. Strong leaders don’t ignore accountability. They simply recognize that understanding someone first often leads to better outcomes.
One mindset that has served me well over the years is this:
“Maybe something is going on that I don’t know about.”
That perspective helps keep emotions in check and allows leaders to approach difficult conversations with professionalism, empathy, and clarity.
Because leadership is not just about correcting behavior. It’s about developing people over the long term. And when people feel heard, they are far more likely to improve, re-engage, and trust your leadership moving forward.
Before your next difficult conversation, ask yourself: Am I entering this discussion with assumptions… or with curiosity?



Comments