Exit Interviews - Yay or Nay?
- Dana Dillard

- Jun 4
- 2 min read

Exit Interviews: Worth It… or a Waste of Time?
Leaders tend to fall into two camps:
Group 1: “Why bother? They’re leaving - it’s all going to be negative.”
or
Group 2: “No one’s honest anyway - they don’t want to burn bridges.”
So, which is it?
Here’s the reality: exit interviews can be incredibly valuable - but only if you structure them the right way.
A few principles that actually make them work:
1. Create a space for real honesty: If the process doesn’t feel safe, the feedback won’t be real. Skip the direct manager - and in some cases even HR. A neutral, trusted party (think ombudsman or uninvolved leader) can make all the difference.
2. Timing matters more than you think: Some of the best insights don’t come on the way out the door. Consider a follow-up conversation 60–90 days later with a respected leader, asking one simple question:
“What could we have done differently to make you stay?”
You’ll often get a much clearer - and more candid - answer.
3. Don’t ask if you won’t act: Nothing erodes trust faster than asking for feedback and ignoring it. If you’re going to invest in exit interviews, build a tight process:
* Identify real reasons for departure
* Capture themes and patterns
* Highlight what worked - not just what didn’t
* Most importantly, turn insights into action
In mortgage servicing - where talent, compliance, and customer experience are tightly connected - losing good people without learning from it is a missed opportunity.
Exit interviews aren’t about looking back. They’re about improving what happens next. The question isn’t whether exit interviews work… It’s whether you’re willing to use them effectively.



Comments